Practice: task title

Status: AUTHORING TEMPLATE. Original companion practice is separate from master-course assessment.

Purpose and evidence

Name the outcome, concrete decision, input rights, core task, expected effort, and artifact to save. Require a purposeful change with an explanation grounded in actual output.

Steps and self-check

Predict, run a bounded example, change one assumption, compare named evidence, and explain a limitation. Give error recovery and saving instructions. Check relevant units, counts, leakage, and reproducibility.

Discussion, feedback, and optional depth

Compare two defensible interpretations with a solo reflection equivalent. Link public feedback after the attempt. Label an optional extension and prerequisites. Core success must not require optional depth, paid GenAI, or a GPU.

Access and local assessment

Use readable code and text/table evidence, without screenshot-only or drawing-only requirements. State grading rules only if locally adopted. Record actual outcome and accessibility verification.